Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] base busybox version for buildroot?
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 20:12:48 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200607312012.48613.rob@landley.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060727183737.GB23639@codepoet.org>

On Thursday 27 July 2006 2:37 pm, Erik Andersen wrote:
> On Thu Jul 27, 2006 at 09:44:42AM -0400, Drew Cohan wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Is the base busybox version for buildroot is now 1.2.0, instead of
> > 1.1.3?  Is there a buildroot config somewhere that determines which
> > version of busybox is used, or is it just based on the date of the
> > buildroot package (builds after 30 June 2006 use busybox 1.2.0)?
> > There seems to have been a file size change recently, just curious
> > what that might have been:
> > 
> > buildroot-20060710.t..> 10-Jul-2006 00:17  3.8M
> > buildroot-20060711.t..> 11-Jul-2006 00:17  4.3M
> 
> It probably makes sense at this point to have configurable
> busybox versions (as with gcc and binuitls) with a specific
> default config for each.

I still think the latest release version is all you need, but what do I 
know? :)

Trying to test our nightly snapshots gets you into fun areas like the -Werror 
stuff where the build breaks on warnings as if they were errors, which works 
fine on gcc 4.0 and earlier under i386, but not so well on gcc 4.1 which 
produces _stupid_ warnings for things that are _not_ broken...

Sigh.  Tweaked the makefiles today so gcc 4.1 doesn't have -Werror because I 
don't think we're _ever_ going to fix some of those.  That compiler version 
is just _broken_...

Rob
-- 
Never bet against the cheap plastic solution.

  reply	other threads:[~2006-08-01  0:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-27  6:45 [Buildroot] base busybox version for buildroot? Drew Cohan
2006-07-27 11:38 ` Erik Andersen
2006-08-01  0:12   ` Rob Landley [this message]
2006-08-01  0:15     ` Marc Lindahl
2006-08-01  0:37       ` Rob Landley
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-27 12:00 Daniels, Brian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200607312012.48613.rob@landley.net \
    --to=rob@landley.net \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox