From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Lundquist Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 09:29:07 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] LZMA in Buldroot. In-Reply-To: <20061004192606.GO17455@aon.at> References: <20061003173002.GA19937@zelow.no> <20061004084732.GA15165@aon.at> <20061004144046.GA32537@zelow.no> <20061004162028.GA18682@aon.at> <20061004163742.GA2306@zelow.no> <20061004192606.GO17455@aon.at> Message-ID: <20061005072907.GA17753@zelow.no> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 09:26:07PM +0200, Bernhard Fischer wrote: > > > >as snipped out from the original lzma.mk, it's commented out which is > > Yes, i left it commented out. I had (and still have) trouble with c++ > due to an alleged bug with libtool on my ubuntu devel host. I don't think you're the only one. BTW; we should have uClibc++ available in buildroot. maybe I'll look at it. (I haven't seen it, maybe I'm just blind?) > Yes, i do and will add it too when i have verified and applied your > diff. No timeframe on checking it, though. > > If you find the time to add the rule for the header(s), then i'll > blindly apply your take 3 patch see if i need any additional changes. > I don't know if anybody except me does currently use lzma via buildroot > on their targets, so i do not feel obligued to be exceptionally stable > at that end.. I use LZMA on my target (ARM9 but also floppyfw, which is intel and buld using a devkit build by buildroot...), so you're not the only one :=) BTW, I had lzma in buildroot some time ago but I've been using the SDK directly and not the lzma-utils, which are a derivative. I have to admit I am a bit unsure if lzma-utils is the right thing altho it's more compatible option wise. (which could be fixed by a wrapper script). but now we use lzma-utils and I am digressing alot. You can, if you want to, wait with applying the patch and I'll verify it myself (have to admit I havent after moving it from toolchain to package.) and also add the lzma-headers back in. Thomas.