From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bernhard Fischer <rep.nop@aon.at>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 10:18:26 +0200
Subject: [Buildroot] LZMA in Buldroot.
In-Reply-To: <20061005072907.GA17753@zelow.no>
References: <20061003173002.GA19937@zelow.no> <20061004084732.GA15165@aon.at>
	<20061004144046.GA32537@zelow.no> <20061004162028.GA18682@aon.at>
	<20061004163742.GA2306@zelow.no> <20061004192606.GO17455@aon.at>
	<20061005072907.GA17753@zelow.no>
Message-ID: <20061005081826.GB27271@aon.at>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 09:29:07AM +0200, Thomas Lundquist wrote:

>BTW; we should have uClibc++ available in buildroot. maybe I'll look at
>it. (I haven't seen it, maybe I'm just blind?)

I think that you are right, there is no uClibc++ in buildroot yet.
Until now, i hesitated to look at adding it since i do not know how
intrusive it is wrt using it for the toolchain..

>You can, if you want to, wait with applying the patch and I'll verify it 
>myself (have to admit I havent after moving it from toolchain to package.) 
>and also add the lzma-headers back in.

That would be great, please do so :)

cheers,