From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bernhard Fischer Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 14:17:17 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] Buildroot, NAND flash and missing mkfs.jffs2 option In-Reply-To: <1164805461.456d8555257e8@imp2-g19.free.fr> References: <1164737384.456c7b6809f9d@imp3-g19.free.fr> <20061128201514.GC27344@aon.at> <1164805461.456d8555257e8@imp2-g19.free.fr> Message-ID: <20061129131717.GB6388@aon.at> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 02:04:21PM +0100, julien.boibessot at free.fr wrote: >Hi ! > >> I think there is at least one report at bugs.busybox.net about jffs2, >> namely an endian fix and maybe another report. It would be great if you >> could verify that the endian patch does break nothing for you, so that i >> can apply it safely and check if there is already a report WRT jffs2 and >> -n. If there is already such a report, then i ask you to be so kind and >> to point me to it and also point out further problems you did encounter >> with jffs2 (like the -n you mentioned above). >> > >I didn't find such a report (search with jffs2) so I have open a new one: >http://busybox.net/bugs/view.php?id=1105 My bad, it was a report about cramfs. > >If you need a patch to correct the problem, let me know, I can generate one >against Buildroot version 20060908 (the snapshot I'm using). Yes, please send a patch. TIA, Bernhard