From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ynezz Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 21:47:43 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/package/udev In-Reply-To: <20061201175030.GB27853@aon.at> References: <20061129185944.32BC84858D@busybox.net> <20061129213847.GC15202@ibawizard.net> <20061201175030.GB27853@aon.at> Message-ID: <20061201204743.GH15202@ibawizard.net> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Bernhard Fischer [2006-12-01 18:50:30]: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 10:38:47PM +0100, Petr Stetiar wrote: > >aldot at uclibc.org [2006-11-29 10:59:44]: > > > >> Author: aldot > >> Date: 2006-11-29 10:59:43 -0800 (Wed, 29 Nov 2006) > >> New Revision: 16723 > >> > >> Log: > >> - build a udev for the target rather than for the host. > > > >Attached patch bumps version to 100, fixes Makefile and init script. > > I use busybox's mdev if i need someone to mknod under me, but ok. > A few questions / remarks. > > Why do we want to update udev? That I don't know :) I wanted to try it it and then found out, that it don't work. So that's why I've send a patch. > me at s37:~/src/buildroot$ patch --dry-run -p1 -i udev_100.patch > missing header for unified diff at line 5 of patch > can't find file to patch at input line 5 > Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? Hm strange, it was just svn diff > udev_100.patch. No additional editing. > Not your fault, but if !; then echo;exit;fi > looks like it be saner on context switches and also cycle-wise nicer. Ok. > I guess that this is not relevant for people who use udev, so i'll > pretend to have kept my silence in this respect. Wonder why your system > takes longer to boot than the system i'm playing with which needs less > than 15s? *shrug* :) I'm just playing with my board, I'm using udev just for kernel/fs updating purposes via USB flash disk and yes, it's big overhead. Didn't know about mkdev, I'll try it, thanks. -- ynezz