Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bernhard Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] microcom broken with latest uclibc snapshot.
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:49:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070123094900.GA14123@aon.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <004a01c73ed1$21643210$01c4af0a@atmel.com>

On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 10:06:16AM +0100, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
>Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>>On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 12:32:37AM +0100, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
>>>When using the latest uClibc snapshot to build the toolchain,
>>>It looks like the high speeds are not acceptable (> 1151200)
>>>and the generated <staging_dir>/arm-linux/sys-include/bits/termios.h
>>>has higher speeds commented away.
>>>
>>>#if 0 /* limited on uClibc, keep in sync w/ cfsetspeed.c */
>>>#define B230400 0010003
>>>...
>>>#endif
>>>
>>>This is not a good idea, if the MCU can handle higher speed!
>>>
>>>It also breaks microcom-1.02.
>>
>>I'm pretty sure that i fixed microcom, please update and confirm
>>since i only compile tested it..
>
>My Buildroot copy is from 2007-01-16.

today is something like 2007-01-23 (for me) ;)

$ svn log -r "{2007-01-16}:HEAD" | grep -e ^r[[:digit:]] | wc -l
78

We had 78 patches going in since then.

>
>But why limit the UART speed?
>An AT91RM9200 can do 460kBAUD.
>Have several customer which would like to avoid
>such artificial limitation.
>Isn't it better to make the max speed a configuration item?

I don't see a reason why it shouldn't be configurable, agree.
Perhaps send a proposed patch along the rational to the uClibc list..

      reply	other threads:[~2007-01-23  9:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-22 23:32 [Buildroot] microcom broken with latest uclibc snapshot Ulf Samuelsson
2007-01-23  0:18 ` Bernhard Fischer
2007-01-23  9:06   ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-01-23  9:49     ` Bernhard Fischer [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070123094900.GA14123@aon.at \
    --to=rep.dot.nop@gmail.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox