From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bernhard Fischer Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 16:25:32 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] AVR32 patch (& others) In-Reply-To: <563e01c742e2$fb5b8670$dcc4af0a@atmel.com> References: <20070128111333.GO28221@aon.at> <563e01c742e2$fb5b8670$dcc4af0a@atmel.com> Message-ID: <20070128152531.GR28221@aon.at> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 02:38:00PM +0100, Ulf Samuelsson wrote: >Hi Bernard, >You said that you would commit the prepatory AVR32 patch as soon as >the confusion of multiple sends was sorted out. .. and as soon as other stuff which went in my queue earlier is done (or any other stuff i decide to do for that matter. I do not mean to sound harsh, but remember that i'm not one of those timesys people who get money for providing support for Atmel. It is my time, i don't have any board you're adding to play with, so my interrest in helping you is purely voluntarily. Please keep this in mind, thanks). Merged anyway (hope i picked the correct version. It would help if you could put numbers in your patches, like, e.g.: Atmel_Config.in.02.patch or the like.). Thanks. >Still any problems? > >Also: > No reply on the "BSP" patch, the "TARGET_CFLAGS" and the "local" patches. BSP is a bug squashing party. It's fun but i don't want to party right now ;) The TARGET_CFLAGS is something that doesn't sound clean to me, fwiw: Put them into TARGET_CONFIGURE_OPTS for a start. Then build _all_ packages to see if you broke something. For those packages that still do not pick up the TARGET_CFLAGS properly, additionally pass TARGET_CONFIGURE_OPTS to the $(MAKE) in the respective packages I'd say.