From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bernhard Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:39:06 +0200
Subject: [Buildroot] RFC  Building Linux under Buildroot.
In-Reply-To: <01ba01c781b2$63d89a90$01c4af0a@Glamdring>
References: <1176885902.8660.5.camel@elrond.sweden.atmel.com>
	<20070418114046.GA10335@aon.at>
	<01ba01c781b2$63d89a90$01c4af0a@Glamdring>
Message-ID: <20070418133906.GA11554@aon.at>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 02:07:46PM +0200, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Bernhard Fischer" <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
>To: "Ulf Samuelsson" <ulf@atmel.com>
>Cc: <buildroot@uclibc.org>
>Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 1:40 PM
>Subject: Re: [Buildroot] RFC Building Linux under Buildroot.
>
>
>>On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 10:45:02AM +0200, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
>>>I enclose the Makefile.in and Config.in I use to Build Linux.
>>>I have them in my targets/linux directory.
>>>
>>>Would like to have comments on that before I generate a real patch.
>>>Think it makes for easier reading than the patch.
>>>
>>>Basically I would like to bbe able to select the most
>>>common choices using checkboxes, but also allow full flexiubility
>>>by providing a text version as well.
>>
>>>From a cursory look that seems fine.
>>Does this handle multiple patch-files ?
>>
>
>Yes, but the patchfiles are in a linux  patch directory.

So, IIUC, it doesn't handle downloading multiple patchfiles yet?
$(patsubst %,$(PATCHFILE_DIR)/%,$(foo_CUSTOM_PATCHES)): same_for_http
	wget ... -O $@
may work.