From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Lundquist Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 20:42:52 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [RFC] Support for "distributions" in buildroot In-Reply-To: <044b01c7cb1e$8db0a550$dcc4af0a@atmel.com> References: <1184934649.6382.10.camel@elrond.sweden.atmel.com> <20070720140438.GB29640@real.realitydiluted.com> <044b01c7cb1e$8db0a550$dcc4af0a@atmel.com> Message-ID: <20070721184252.GA2523@zelow.no> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 12:34:36AM +0200, Ulf Samuelsson wrote: > > Your suggestions means that either the end customer will get > a buildroot frozen at a certain time, or that the maintenance > effort to keep buildroot up to date has to be duplicated. I believe in frozen snapshots instead of specifying source versions. The rest of buildroot are also in so much flux that only being able to specify source package versions is just a small part to the solution. Patches are added, build system changed and so on. Thomas.