From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bernhard Fischer Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 13:04:17 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] _VER vs. _VERSION breakage In-Reply-To: <0707231218440.1707@somehost> References: <20070715104024.GB4096@aon.at> <1184615647.18357.27.camel@elrond.sweden.atmel.com> <20070723095243.GC6597@aon.at> <0707231218440.1707@somehost> Message-ID: <20070723110417.GE7044@aon.at> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 12:22:41PM +0200, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote: >On Mon, 23 Jul 2007, Bernhard Fischer wrote: > >> On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 09:54:06PM +0200, Ulf Samuelsson wrote: >> >s?n 2007-07-15 klockan 12:40 +0200 skrev Bernhard Fischer: >> >> Ulf, >> >> >> >> Your change to use _VERSION broke at least acpid. Please double-check >> >> that all packages that you touched in this patch still build fine and >> >> repair. >> > >> >Here is the result of trying to build most available packages >> >in buildroot for ARM. (I build for ARM generic (not using WCHAR)). >> >> I will revert that _VERSION vs. _VER patch since it breaks a couple of >> packages. > >Now this is IMO a rather silly :( You made your point. Can't you just >fix those "couple of packages" instead and stop this ping-pong game? I don't have time to fix them and since they worked before, reverting it is fine. It's not that i didn't wait for 1 week (!) to allow Ulf (or anybody else) to fix it up.. Selecting i386 in the config isn't really hard, i suppose. pong.