From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bernhard Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 18:41:24 +0200
Subject: [Buildroot] package/linux/Makefile.in does not include
	'openswan' patches
In-Reply-To: <000401c7cd42$28b0cec0$dcc4af0a@atmel.com>
References: <1185196286.21840.18.camel@elrond.sweden.atmel.com>
	<20070723132936.GB7902@aon.at> <20070723142207.GA9324@aon.at>
	<000401c7cd42$28b0cec0$dcc4af0a@atmel.com>
Message-ID: <20070723164124.GA9995@aon.at>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 05:19:36PM +0200, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 03:29:36PM +0200, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>>>On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 03:11:26PM +0200, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
>>>>The Kernel Headers buildscript applies the openswan patches 
>>>>on top of the kernel headers, but the target/linux/Makefile.in does not.
>>>
>>>The headers (which used the very same sourcedir, dunno if it still does
>>>with your toolchain/linux* stuff) have to be patched. To achieve this,
>>>we patch the source before installing the headers.
>>>>
>>>>Isn't this a bug?
>>>
>>>I don't understand? You can't apply patches twice, if you mean to
>>>suggests this (you most likely don't, i assume).
>> 
>> ok, you broke building a linux kernel.
>> 
>
>No, Stephen did...
>He patched the linux makefile with the BSP patch.
>Please give the credit where it is due.

Please accept my apologies. This BSP stuff should not have been applied
in it's current incarnation :(