From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bernhard Fischer Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:39:34 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/package/sdl In-Reply-To: <20070725173927.E0BE0A5E25@busybox.net> References: <20070725173927.E0BE0A5E25@busybox.net> Message-ID: <20070725223934.GB11697@aon.at> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 10:39:27AM -0700, ulf at uclibc.org wrote: >Author: ulf >Date: 2007-07-25 10:39:26 -0700 (Wed, 25 Jul 2007) >New Revision: 19261 > >Log: >Make SDL seled DirectFB > >Modified: > trunk/buildroot/package/sdl/Config.in > > >Changeset: >Modified: trunk/buildroot/package/sdl/Config.in >=================================================================== >--- trunk/buildroot/package/sdl/Config.in 2007-07-25 17:37:50 UTC (rev 19260) >+++ trunk/buildroot/package/sdl/Config.in 2007-07-25 17:39:26 UTC (rev 19261) >@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ > config BR2_PACKAGE_SDL > bool "SDL" > default n >+ select BR2_PACKAGE_DIRECTFB Why? It's perfectly fine to build SDL without a) FB support (any FB support) b) with the stock FB (no directfb) If you want directfb and directfb-support, the you should select it manually, no?