From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bernhard Fischer Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 10:39:14 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/toolchain/gcc In-Reply-To: <1185781988.15219.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20070729174350.EF22BA4508@busybox.net> <20070730072137.GB21479@aon.at> <1185781988.15219.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <20070730083914.GA22956@aon.at> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 09:53:08AM +0200, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote: > >On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 09:21 +0200, Bernhard Fischer wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 10:43:50AM -0700, ulf at uclibc.org wrote: > > > >> >+config BR2_GCC_TARGET_AVR32_CONFIGURATION >> >+ bool "Enable default AVR32 GCC configuration" >> >+ default y >> >+ depends BR2_avr32 && BR2_PACKAGE_GCC_TARGET >> >+ help >> >+ For the AVR32 platform there is some configuration which are not >> >+ supported. >> >+ >> >+ Currently this will add "--disable-libmudflap" to configure. >> >+ >> >> I object to this change. >> Please explain why you don't just add disable-mudflap if the target arch >> is BR2_avr32 > >So a little patch to alter the toolchain/gcc/Makefile.in to modify >EXTRA_TARGET_GCC_CONFIG_OPTIONS when ARCH is avr32 is a clean and nice >solution? > >And remove this stuff from Config.in.2? exactly, yes. > >If the solution above, I agree. > >> > config BR2_EXTRA_TARGET_GCC_CONFIG_OPTIONS >> > string "Additional target gcc options" >> > default "" >> >+ depends BR2_PACKAGE_GCC_TARGET >> > help >> > Any additional target gcc options you may want to include.... >> > Including, but not limited to --disable-checking etc.