From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bernhard Fischer Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:08:18 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] buildroot-20070720 In-Reply-To: <1187754477.4494.11.camel@86-115-11-152> References: <1187730489.15882.7.camel@86-115-11-152> <20070821230818.GS11697@aon.at> <1187754477.4494.11.camel@86-115-11-152> Message-ID: <20070822080818.GA7523@aon.at> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 05:47:57AM +0200, Ulf Samuelsson wrote: >ons 2007-08-22 klockan 01:08 +0200 skrev Bernhard Fischer: >> On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:08:09PM +0200, Ulf Samuelsson wrote: >> >Since the buildroot ftp site only maintains one month old tarball, >> >this package has already disappeared. >> >It would be good if that tarball could be downloadable as well >> >so that the diff can be computed. >> >> To me this doesn't make any sense at all. >> svn co -r'{2007-07-20 00:00}' svn://uclibc.org/trunk/buildroot buildroot >> >> What do you want to achieve with a tarball? Doesn't svn diff work just >> fine? And, what's special about that 20070720 snapshot in the first >> place? > >Sorry, wrong mailing list. >Was intended for an Atmel internal mailing list. >The "Evolution" Mail program does not easily show how >it completes a mail address. > >http://www.atmel.no/buildroot/ is based on 20070718. >Would like to move this stuff to the main trunk > >I got an earlier version in the summertime, and did not have >the original source so I diffed against the current, >and tried to figure out what was added. >That was the time, when I reverted some of your patches. > >Would like to avoid that, so I want the original source. Perhaps it would be a good idea if you (atmel) would use an SCM instead of tarballs. Would make your life way easier, i imagine. Just a thought..