From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bernhard Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 21:19:50 +0200
Subject: [Buildroot] buildroot-20070720
In-Reply-To: <032a01c7e4e2$b5fb0fe0$980b7356@atmel.com>
References: <1187730489.15882.7.camel@86-115-11-152>
	<20070821230818.GS11697@aon.at>
	<1187754477.4494.11.camel@86-115-11-152>
	<20070822080818.GA7523@aon.at>
	<00e901c7e4b6$d77a8460$070514ac@atmel.com>
	<20070822124029.GA9846@aon.at>
	<032a01c7e4e2$b5fb0fe0$980b7356@atmel.com>
Message-ID: <20070822191950.GW11697@aon.at>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 06:43:45PM +0200, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
>>>
>>>Is there any chance that buildroot is moving over to "git"?.
>> 
>> given that there is a svn backend for git, this doesn't make much sense
>> to me. They should just pull upstream, git should be able to take care
>> for (most of) the rest, but i'll not mandate how atmel does their
>> busyness here ;)
>> 
>
>Personally, I have never used git except just cloning a tree.
>
>If I understand you correctly, I can pull stuff using git from the svn server
>and then add the stuff I get from my friends and do a merge
>and put back the end result using git talking to the svn server, right?

Don't get me wrong, but this is really none of my business, currently.

Let me point you to the git documentation or google or the like

friendly,
Bernhard