From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bernhard Fischer Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 23:20:34 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] Hiding non-buildable packages In-Reply-To: <1187816364.4321.63.camel@86-115-11-28> References: <1187728137.6145.48.camel@86-115-11-152> <20070822191320.GU11697@aon.at> <1187814296.4321.37.camel@86-115-11-28> <200708222244.38319.yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> <1187816364.4321.63.camel@86-115-11-28> Message-ID: <20070822212034.GC11697@aon.at> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 10:59:24PM +0200, Ulf Samuelsson wrote: >Granted, but do we need it to be perfect?, I think not! > >I know that openssh does not work due to lack of 64 bit math. You are - for the second time today - tempting me to just apply my openssh update which i know may have trouble in some odd places, just FYI.. >I do not think it works for any architecture. >Why should every newbie try this out for themseleves, >only to find that it does not build... Since the default works fine, if somebody tries hard to shoot themselves in the foot, why prevent them from doing so? > >Much better to hide it from the build, and then let the guy >which really wants it to reenable and debug it. No. That's not my approach. Let defaults work, if you change anything, be prepared to keep all parts.