From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bernhard Fischer Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 14:26:48 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/target/device/Atme l: atngw100/target_skeleton atngw100/target etc... In-Reply-To: <1188289279.7412.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1188289279.7412.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <20070828122648.GB24891@aon.at> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 10:21:19AM +0200, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote: > >On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 10:10 +0200, Ulf Samuelsson wrote: >> > Added: >> > trunk/buildroot/target/device/Atmel/atngw100/target_skeleton/bin/ >> >> What is up with all the directories? Is not defining them >> in ...//device_table.txt enough? I find it far better defining >> them there since the access permissions can be defined as well. >> >> >> Some stuff are needed >> during the build and >> the device table is only >> used when you convert >> $(TARGET-DIR) to >> rootfs-avr32.$(fs) which >> is too late. >> >> It can probably be done >> better > >Indeed, the packages failing with an "empty" skeleton should have some >mkdir -p actions in them IMHO. That way not all targets needs to be >fixed, but just one package. Yes, that's the proper thing to do, agree.