From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bernhard Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 17:02:44 +0200
Subject: [Buildroot] [CFT, PATCH] libelf 64bit problems vs. ltrace
In-Reply-To: <20070920092033.GB27699@aon.at>
References: <0709192052250.18886@somehost> <20070919193600.GD817@aon.at>
	<20070920092033.GB27699@aon.at>
Message-ID: <20070921150244.GE5788@aon.at>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net


ping!
I'll happily keep this fixes local if noone cares to double-check that
they help others, too..

On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 11:20:33AM +0200, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 09:36:00PM +0200, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>>On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 09:06:54PM +0200, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
>>>but libvorbis fails to build:
>>>
>>>  In file included from mdct.c:44:
>>>  ../include/vorbis/codec.h:26:21: error: ogg/ogg.h: No such file or
>>>  directory
>>>
>>>Can't seem to be able to build ltrace; something to do with configure not
>>>being able to locate gelf.h, but it's there:
>>>staging_dir/usr/include/libelf, as libelf build ok; I get a configure
>>>error:
>>>
>>>  checking gelf.h usability... no
>>>  checking gelf.h presence... no
>>>  checking for gelf.h... no
>>>  configure: error: ***** gelf.h not found *****
>>>
>>>config.log says in more than one place:
>>>
>>>  /usr/include/libelf/gelf.h:49:2: error: #error "GElf is not supported on
>>>    this sysystem."
>>>
>>>and bails out further down with:
>>>
>>>  configure:3629: checking for gelf.h
>>>  configure:3636: result: no
>>>  configure:3643: error: ***** gelf.h not found *****
>>>
>>>ac_cv_header_gelf_h=no may have something to do with it.
>>>
>>>Any ideas?
>>
>>I've updated ltrace some months ago, but i admit that i have no idea
>>which box this big patches are on :-/
>>...
>>$ ls -ltrn buildroot.mine.OLD.OLD/package/ltrace/
>>total 804
>>-rw-r--r-- 1 1000 1000 627890 Apr  6 14:58 ltrace-svn-20070406.00.patch
>>-rw-r--r-- 1 1000 1000 173414 Apr  6 15:04 ltrace-svn-20070406.01.autoreconf.patch
>>-rw-r--r-- 1 1000 1000   2298 Apr  6 15:07 ltrace.mk
>>-rw-r--r-- 1 1000   40    241 Apr  6 15:25 Config.in
>>
>>I.e. Not too good.
>>
>>Perhaps try this updated version?
>
>The attached builds at least (with largefile enabled for a start).
>Can you confirm that this works for you so i can apply it?
>
>Too big for the list, so it's here:
>http://uclibc.org:/~aldot/buildroot/br2.libelf64-cluebait+ltrace-update.00.diff.bz2
>
>TIA for testing it..