From: Thomas Lundquist <lists@zelow.no>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] buildroot with ipkg
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 00:19:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070922221907.GC711@zelow.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1190496532.46f58914948c8@imp.free.fr>
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 11:28:52PM +0200, julien.boibessot at free.fr wrote:
>
> With the "OpenWrt" method you have:
> * the packages (.ipkg) built for all the Buildroot software you selected with
> menuconfig
> * AND a rootfs with all these packages pre-installed (ready to test your
> configuration)
And a rootfs without any of the packages?
> After that you can upload your packages to your (web)server and share/use them,
> or directly flash the rootfs.
> What I was pointing in my email is that you probably don't need to add your
> "<m>" entry in Buildroot menuconfig. Your option to choose the package type
> should be
> enough: if the user choose to build packages, then you can build them for all
> the selected software.
I kinda like to be able to pick for a base or extras. It may make it a
tad more complex but since I've already solved it, I'm happy.
(Thanks Kconfig :=)
> Sorry, I probably failed to explain my thoughts clearly...
> Why not build all software as packages when the user want it and as "builtin" in
> the other case ?
I want more flexibility. Busybox is an example, it's usually needed to
being able to add a package, so it's a part of the base. or is it if you
add util-linux and gnu tools? so which one should become a package? or
not become one?
The builder (should) know this and do the right pick.
> Don't forget package dependencies...
I'm not bothered with them right now but I do have that on my list of
things to add when I know that it's accepted.
But it should be quite simple with the autotools stuff so I guess I
might start there as soon as I've been able to compile a simple X server
with a few drivers.
> If you need help to integrate ipkg, I have already some modifications of
> Buildroot to share with you, before publishing them.
Sounds good.
Thomas.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-22 22:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-17 12:09 [Buildroot] buildroot with ipkg pasteur
2007-09-17 19:44 ` Julien Boibessot
2007-09-17 20:14 ` Erik Andersen
2007-09-17 21:17 ` Julien Boibessot
2007-09-19 6:42 ` Thomas Lundquist
2007-09-19 12:17 ` Thomas Lundquist
2007-09-19 19:27 ` Bernhard Fischer
2007-09-19 20:56 ` Thomas Lundquist
2007-09-19 21:50 ` Bernhard Fischer
2007-09-20 21:16 ` Julien Boibessot
2007-09-20 21:37 ` Thomas Lundquist
2007-09-22 21:28 ` julien.boibessot at free.fr
2007-09-22 21:43 ` Bernhard Fischer
2007-09-22 22:19 ` Thomas Lundquist [this message]
2007-09-20 9:06 ` Elizabeth Oldham
2007-09-20 10:52 ` Thomas Lundquist
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-09-22 22:28 Thomas Lundquist
2007-09-23 20:43 ` Bernhard Fischer
2007-11-14 10:12 ` Thomas Lundquist
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070922221907.GC711@zelow.no \
--to=lists@zelow.no \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox