From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bernhard Fischer Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 22:49:14 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] --with-abi= ... during gcc build In-Reply-To: <1191097947.5322.282.camel@elrond.atmel.sweden> References: <1191087530.5322.275.camel@elrond.atmel.sweden> <20070929182857.GS20951@aon.at> <1191097947.5322.282.camel@elrond.atmel.sweden> Message-ID: <20070929204914.GU20951@aon.at> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 10:32:26PM +0200, Ulf Samuelsson wrote: >l?r 2007-09-29 klockan 20:28 +0200 skrev Bernhard Fischer: >> On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 07:38:50PM +0200, Ulf Samuelsson wrote: >> >gcc configure is passed $(GCC_WITH_ABI) >> >which is defined as: >> >toolchain/gcc/Makefile.in:GCC_WITH_ABI:=--with-abi=$(BR2_GCC_TARGET_ABI) >> >> Well, if it is empty it will not be set, so there is something wrong at >> your end, really. >> ifneq ($(strip $(subst ",,$(BR2_GCC_TARGET_ABI))),) >> # "))) >> GCC_WITH_ABI:=--with-abi=$(BR2_GCC_TARGET_ABI) >> endif Note that this has nothing to do with that. I have a suspicion (comment the EABI selection of the device/Arm/Config.in locally for now. Locally!) >I think this is why I get an EABI compiler >even when OABI is selected in buildroot. grep -i abi .config once again, please. > >I fo not know if --with-abi=32 is the right thing to do for ARM >when OABI is wanted, so if you know it is different, pls change. I took that unreflected and applied it. Oh well..