Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bernhard Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [buildroot 0001537]: kexec doesn't build for	arm/armeb
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 23:32:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071019213256.GA1593@aon.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a1a26c05871e60062b21dcb76a88bbe1@busybox.net>

On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 10:27:31PM -0700, bugs at busybox.net wrote:
>
>The following issue has been RESOLVED. 

Ulf,

If you close a bug, then please CLOSE it, so it doesn't show up as not
closed in mantis.
There are a couple of these that you have to CLOSE. Please do..
Thanks.
>====================================================================== 
>http://busybox.net/bugs/view.php?id=1537 
>====================================================================== 
>Reported By:                hmoffatt
>Assigned To:                buildroot
>====================================================================== 
>Project:                    buildroot
>Issue ID:                   1537
>Category:                   Architecture Specific
>Reproducibility:            always
>Severity:                   minor
>Priority:                   normal
>Status:                     resolved
>Resolution:                 fixed
>Fixed in Version:           
>====================================================================== 
>Date Submitted:             10-16-2007 22:32 PDT
>Last Modified:              10-17-2007 22:27 PDT
>====================================================================== 
>Summary:                    kexec doesn't build for arm/armeb
>Description: 
>kexec doesn't build on arm or armeb.
>
>Problems are:
>1. armeb not a supported architecture;
>2. arm support patch needs to be updated due to an internal API change.
>
>Fix is trivial - attached.
>====================================================================== 
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> hmoffatt - 10-17-07 21:43  
>---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>Use kexec-arm-fix2 instead. It fixes the incorrect syscall number in the
>original source. 
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> UlfSamuelsson - 10-17-07 22:27  
>---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>kexec-arm-fix2 has been applied in revision 20278 
>
>Issue History 
>Date Modified   Username       Field                    Change               
>====================================================================== 
>10-16-07 22:32  hmoffatt       New Issue                                    
>10-16-07 22:32  hmoffatt       Status                   new => assigned     
>10-16-07 22:32  hmoffatt       Assigned To               => buildroot       
>10-16-07 22:33  hmoffatt       File Added: kexec-arm-fix                    
>10-17-07 21:42  hmoffatt       File Added: kexec-arm-fix2                    
>10-17-07 21:43  hmoffatt       Note Added: 0002831                          
>10-17-07 22:27  UlfSamuelsson  Status                   assigned => resolved
>10-17-07 22:27  UlfSamuelsson  Resolution               open => fixed       
>10-17-07 22:27  UlfSamuelsson  Note Added: 0002832                          
>======================================================================
>
>_______________________________________________
>buildroot mailing list
>buildroot at uclibc.org
>http://busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot

  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-19 21:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-18  5:27 [Buildroot] [buildroot 0001537]: kexec doesn't build for arm/armeb bugs at busybox.net
2007-10-19 21:32 ` Bernhard Fischer [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-10-30 21:44 bugs at busybox.net
2007-10-18  4:43 bugs at busybox.net
2007-10-17  5:33 bugs at busybox.net

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071019213256.GA1593@aon.at \
    --to=rep.dot.nop@gmail.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox