From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@cloud.net.au>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] Several issues with building multiple "projects" for same architecture
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 11:10:45 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071030001045.GA5198@cloud.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1193698207.8485.4.camel@local.atmel.sweden>
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 11:50:07PM +0100, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
> m?n 2007-10-29 klockan 10:55 -0500 skrev Jonathan Nalley:
> > I am using the buildroot to build for several different boards, some
> > of them have the same CPU architecture (PPC405GP/EP). I have noticed
> > some issues with the "project" concept in the buildroot. Since the
> > builds are for the same architecture the toolchain is created under
> > "build_powerpc". Everything works fine for the first board, but for
> > subsequent builds for different "project" names things are missing
> > under "project_build_powerpc/PROJECT_NAME/root". Specifically:
> >
> > /root/lib/libgcc_s.so
> > /root/usr/lib/libstdc++.so
> > /root/usr/sbin/ethtool
> >
> > This is because the make files that install those files check for:
> >
> > $(GCC_BUILD_DIR2)/.libs_installed
There's another problem with this approach. If you are modifying the
target_skeleton contents you might want to nuke the generated root
directory and have it rebuilt, but then libgcc_s.so (etc) won't be
re-copied.
> Here is a first attempt to fix this,
> I have not tested it yet myself though.
>
> The idea is to create a $(DEP_DIR) directory in $(PROJECT_BUILD_DIR)
> and then to generate a $(<package>).installed in this directory.
This doesn't solve the problem I note either, although I guess you could
also delete *.installed. Why not just depend on the actual target rather
than these stamp files?
thanks,
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-30 0:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-29 15:55 [Buildroot] Several issues with building multiple "projects" for same architecture Jonathan Nalley
2007-10-29 17:33 ` Bernhard Fischer
2007-10-29 18:22 ` [Buildroot] Several issues with building multiple "projects" forsame architecture Ulf Samuelsson
2007-10-29 22:50 ` [Buildroot] Several issues with building multiple "projects" for same architecture Ulf Samuelsson
2007-10-30 0:10 ` Hamish Moffatt [this message]
2007-10-30 7:41 ` [Buildroot] Several issues with building multiple"projects" " Ulf Samuelsson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071030001045.GA5198@cloud.net.au \
--to=hamish@cloud.net.au \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox