From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Lundquist Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:12:59 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] buildroot with ipkg In-Reply-To: <20070923204317.GF20058@aon.at> References: <20070922222827.GD711@zelow.no> <20070923204317.GF20058@aon.at> Message-ID: <20071114101259.GA2834@zelow.no> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 10:43:17PM +0200, Bernhard Fischer wrote: About time I commit something package related but I feel we have to agree. > Earlier today, i thought a little bit about that, too. This would > certainly be a nice thing to have. We would create a make-includeable > file, let's say .auto.deps, that is included after BASE_TARGETS are set, > but before including any other stuff. > > .auto.deps could look something like: > libpcap: $(BASE_TARGETS) zlib > tcpdump: $(BASE_TARGETS) libpcap This would then have to replace the SELECT and DEPENDS in Config.in. having it in two places is dangerous. make *config could do the include or merging. > See r19978 and the log for it for further details and questions that > arose.. (apart from my typo "thoughs welcome" which lack a "t" > somewhere) Have to admit I lost you there. Not sure what you meant. For those wanting to read the comment: http://buildroot.uclibc.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?rev=19978&view=rev Anyway; any reason I should NOT add my packages patchset? I know it's not perfect but it's definately a start. the monkeywork of changeing all the FOO_DIR thingies in every .mk file is a valid reason not to but I'm willing to do it and I don't have a better solution for it. Thomas.