From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hamish Moffatt Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:23:48 +1100 Subject: [Buildroot] HUGE patch for buildroot In-Reply-To: <46a136670802091828v558e5d50n131cc9076605bd7c@mail.gmail.com> References: <46a136670802091828v558e5d50n131cc9076605bd7c@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080210232348.GA32402@cloud.net.au> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 09:28:35PM -0500, John Voltz wrote: > I'm wondering if the buildroot maintainers frequent this list, and if > so, how do you feel about receiving a humongous patch for it? I've > been working on bugfixes for well over a week now and I believe it's > going to be a huge patch. It would take me weeks more to break it into > individual patches. So far I've fixed a bunch of incorrect package > install arguments that cause problems with pkgconfig and libtool > resulting in build failures. I've added the X.org fonts and some other > missing X.org packages, icu, fltk, webkit, midori, ipkg, updated > cairo, pango, gtk, and glib to the latest versions. I also merged the > current branch of the Atmel AVR32 buildroot architecture for that CPU. > Is there any interest in it, or should I just keep it to myself? I think it would help if you can separate it to some extent eg the AVR32 branch separate from X changes separate from the build fixes. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB