From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hamish Moffatt Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 00:09:23 +1000 Subject: [Buildroot] Still no answer for a contribution -- "me too" In-Reply-To: <1213361084.10637.18.camel@kokopelli> References: <20080611161156.33737116@crazy> <200806130824.42363.buildroot.atmel.com@pollet.net> <87a5b0800806130407wddd40a0v53712cddcb76b611@mail.gmail.com> <20080613120529.GB31396@cloud.net.au> <1213361084.10637.18.camel@kokopelli> Message-ID: <20080613140923.GA4318@cloud.net.au> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 05:44:44AM -0700, Brian Beattie wrote: > On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 22:05 +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > > Personally even though I have commit access I think it is still good to > > discuss anything remotely controversial before committing it. Most > > changes (new packages, package updates) don't fall in that category of > > course. > > I have a change I'd love to discuss. I have asked twice now about the > correct place to add support for a new board and have received no > response whatever. > > This makes me sceptical of even trying to submit a patch. > > try #3, I would like to add support for a board from KwikByte based on > the at91rm9200 processor. should I add it to target/device/Atmel or > should I create a new directory target/device/KwikByte or some other > location. > > I have a patch for the first option. I don't know the answer. Is the board made by Atmel or some other vendor? Are the other boards in target/device/Atmel all made by Atmel or a mix of vendors? I guess it should follow the lead of the other boards. The Atmel guys seem to be suggesting it should go in target/device/KwikByte. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB