From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bernhard Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:36:46 +0200
Subject: [Buildroot] GIT or SVN
In-Reply-To: <87iqw5dyyb.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk>
References: <485A3396.80701@cetrtapot.si> <87iqw5dyyb.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk>
Message-ID: <20080620083646.GB12682@mx.loc>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 09:09:00PM +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>>>>>> "Hinko" == Hinko Kocevar <hinko.kocevar@cetrtapot.si> writes:
>
> Hinko> Hello,
> Hinko> I'm new to the uclibc buildroot. I've noticed that there are
> Hinko> two repositories: GIT and SVN. GIT looks more up2date. Is GIT
> Hinko> the tree to use?
>
>It depends ;) Bernhards git tree is more uptodate regarding toolchain,
>but the svn tree has more/newer packages and more developers.

Exactly. I basically ignore packages completely, apart from the, let's
say 5-10 that i actually use or find useful.