From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hamish Moffatt Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:24:08 +1000 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/1] openssl: convert to Makefile.autotools.in and bump version to 0.9.8g In-Reply-To: <1218542611-21908-1-git-send-email-hans-christian.egtvedt@atmel.com> References: <1218542611-21908-1-git-send-email-hans-christian.egtvedt@atmel.com> Message-ID: <20080813032408.GA1773@cloud.net.au> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 02:03:31PM +0200, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote: > This patch converts building of OpenSSL to use Makefile.autotools.in and bumps OpenSSL doesn't use autotools though, so is this a good idea? > +$(OPENSSL_TARGET_CONFIGURE): > + (cd $(OPENSSL_DIR); \ > + $(TARGET_CONFIGURE_ARGS) \ > + $(TARGET_CONFIGURE_OPTS) \ > + ./Configure \ > + linux-$(OPENSSL_TARGET_ARCH) \ > + --prefix=/usr \ > + --openssldir=/usr/lib/ssl \ > + threads \ > + shared \ > + no-idea \ > + no-mdc2 \ > + no-rc5 \ > + zlib-dynamic \ > ) Once you've overriden the CONFIGURE stage, is there much benefit left in using Makefile.autotools.in? cheers Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB