From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans-Christian Egtvedt Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 10:43:45 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [BR-AVR32] [PATCH] Support for new MIMC200 board In-Reply-To: <48EB1EDF.6070209@mimc.co.uk> References: <48EA05EB.7020807@mimc.co.uk> <20081007074128.12613e2c@hcegtvedt> <48EB1EDF.6070209@mimc.co.uk> Message-ID: <20081007104345.59bacec2@hcegtvedt> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 09:33:35 +0100 Mark Jackson wrote: > Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote: > > On Mon, 06 Oct 2008 13:34:51 +0100 > > Mark Jackson wrote: > > > >> Please consider the following patch which adds support for a new > >> AVR32 based board. > >> > >> The board is closely based on Atmel's NGW100 reference board, but > >> has an extra 8MByte FLASH and 128KByte FRAM. > >> > >> The compressed patch is 66k, so I've stuck it on our website. > >> > >> http://www.mimc.co.uk/mimc200-new-board.patch.bz2 > >> > > > > Could you post it in plain text attachment/inline instead? It is a > > bit hard to comment on a compressed patch file ;) > > Urm ... the patch is about 220k uncompressed. I thought it was a > "bad thing" to post such a large patch. > > However, I'm happy to do so if you want !! > Hmm, that was a bit large, yes. You must split up your patch, it contains far more than just a new board. Each patch should only add/change one feature in Buildroot. I would also recommend that you get all the kernel and U-Boot stuff upstream first, and then go for the Buildroot stuff. > > Is the patch based on the latest uclibc.org repo or Buildroot for > > AVR32 release (v2.2.0)? > > The latest svn (actually r23594). > Then it is better if you post it to uclibc.org mailing list, I import stuff from uclibc.org, so eventually it will end up in my fork() as well. -- Best regards, Hans-Christian Egtvedt