From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 14:43:26 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] Problem with program_transform_name and naming of installed binaries In-Reply-To: <20081031113307.14125656@surf> References: <20081031113307.14125656@surf> Message-ID: <20081031144326.24ce23c1@surf> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Le Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:33:07 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni a ?crit : > Of course, this is not the desired behaviour, since binaries on the > target also end up with the arm-blablabla prefix. However, after a > quick look at ./configure, I don't really understand what's the logic > to compute this program_transform_name variable. > > Any clue ? FYI, the related autoconf documentation is available at http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/manual/html_node/Transforming-Names.html#Transforming-Names. It seems that by default, the binary names are transformed to be prefixed with the target name, which is what I see. Should we add --program-prefix= and --program-transform-name= to the CONFIGURE_OPTS ? Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com