From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans-Christian Egtvedt Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 14:25:58 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/package/qtopia4 In-Reply-To: <20081201141958.5eb0cfe9@surf> References: <20081201130602.AB0FD3C78E@busybox.net> <20081201140854.287670ff@surf> <20081201141201.507161b7@hcegtvedt> <20081201141958.5eb0cfe9@surf> Message-ID: <20081201142558.7b214b59@hcegtvedt> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Mon, 1 Dec 2008 14:19:58 +0100 Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Le Mon, 1 Dec 2008 14:12:01 +0100, > Hans-Christian Egtvedt a ?crit : > > > Okay, then we'll enable them only if we have an external toolchain. > > Yes, probably. But then, if you encountered some breakage with them > and an internal toolchain, maybe the same breakage occurs with an > external toolchain ? > They probably will if the external toolchain is for cross compiling. What architecture was your external toolchain for? Was it configured very similar to the host toolchain? > (I tested my patch by building Qtopia with an external toolchain, and > it worked. But maybe I didn't build exactly the same thing as you > did). > The problem I triggered was that stdio.h in uClibc is not equal to stdio.h in glibc on my build machine, so the host compiler got utterly confused. I think I'll leave it until we have some proper data on who uses what kinds of toolchains. Could it be that your external toolchain just needs a massage? -- Best regards, Hans-Christian Egtvedt