From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@cloud.net.au>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:39:46 +1100
Subject: [Buildroot] buildroot using glibc
In-Reply-To: <1CD05B980C94AC408B37C82BBABAA3E60F1C966A@mtsexchange.dc.multitech.prv>
References: <1CD05B980C94AC408B37C82BBABAA3E60F1C966A@mtsexchange.dc.multitech.prv>
Message-ID: <20081209233946.GA26329@cloud.net.au>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 02:31:07PM -0600, Tim Barr wrote:
> That information would be helpful for me also. With a design that uses a
> 256M byte NAND Flash, I have less of an issue with building an tiny RFS.
> I still like using busybox, though from a file maintenance standpoint.

What benefit do you see in using glibc?

thanks,
Hamish
-- 
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>