From: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <hans-christian.egtvedt@atmel.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/package/webkit
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:06:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090128090655.49da87fd@hcegtvedt> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fxj3x3ou.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk>
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:58:09 +0100
Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org> wrote:
> >>>>> "Hans-Christian" == Hans-Christian Egtvedt
> >>>>> <hans-christian.egtvedt@atmel.com> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> >> --- trunk/buildroot/package/webkit/Config.in 2009-01-27
> >> 15:02:40 UTC (rev 25080) +++
> >> trunk/buildroot/package/webkit/Config.in 2009-01-27
> >> 15:10:08 UTC (rev 25081) @@ -1,5 +1,7 @@ config BR2_PACKAGE_WEBKIT
> >> bool "webkit"
> >> + depends on BR2_INSTALL_LIBSTDCPP
> >> + depends on BR2_USE_WCHAR
>
> Hans-Christian> Do you need C++/WCHAR for webkit as well, or only
> Hans-Christian> icu? If it is only icu then should not kconfig take
> Hans-Christian> care of this dependency since selecting icu package
> Hans-Christian> will not be possible?
>
> Well, you could certainly argue that it should, but the fact is that
> Kconfig doesn't take dependencies into consideration when it handles
> selects, E.G. nothing stops you from select'ing a package with
> unforfilled deps.
>
Ah, then the depends on makes sense. There should be some comment about
why WCHAR is a dependency since webkit seems to not need it.
> Webkit is furthermore C++ code, so that part is atleast correct.
>
Okay
> >> select BR2_PACKAGE_LIBGTK2
> >> select BR2_PACKAGE_ICU
> >> select BR2_PACKAGE_CURL
> >> @@ -11,3 +13,5 @@
> >>
> >> http://webkit.org/
> >>
> >> +comment "webkit requires a toolchain with C++ support and WCHAR
> >> enabled"
> >> + depends on !BR2_INSTALL_LIBSTDCPP || !BR2_USE_WCHAR
> >>
>
> Hans-Christian> And then make a depends on package icu instead?
>
> No, I don't think hiding applications until you by accident manages to
> enable all the required libraries is a good idea.
>
> Applications should select their library dependencies and depend (with
> a comment) on toolchain features.
>
Then I agree that it has to be done like this.
--
Best regards,
Hans-Christian Egtvedt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-28 8:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-27 15:10 [Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/package/webkit jacmet at uclibc.org
2009-01-28 7:10 ` Hans-Christian Egtvedt
2009-01-28 7:58 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-01-28 8:06 ` Hans-Christian Egtvedt [this message]
2009-01-28 8:14 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-01-28 8:19 ` Hans-Christian Egtvedt
2009-01-28 8:30 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-01-28 8:39 ` Hans-Christian Egtvedt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-01-27 15:02 jacmet at uclibc.org
2009-01-27 15:02 jacmet at uclibc.org
2009-01-23 17:49 ulf at uclibc.org
2009-01-27 0:27 ` Hamish Moffatt
2009-01-27 8:25 ` Daniel Laird
2009-01-27 8:57 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-01-27 10:15 ` Daniel James Laird
2009-01-27 15:06 ` Peter Korsgaard
2008-04-24 13:22 ninevoltz at uclibc.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090128090655.49da87fd@hcegtvedt \
--to=hans-christian.egtvedt@atmel.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox