From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: S0L0 at gmx-topmail.de <S0L0@gmx-topmail.de>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 00:34:38 +0100
Subject: [Buildroot] {buildroot 0004384]: GCC 4.3.1 fails with cannot
 compute suffix of object files
In-Reply-To: <4985F291.5010002@hq.tensilica.com>
References: <4983870C.6010607@hq.tensilica.com>
	<4985F291.5010002@hq.tensilica.com>
Message-ID: <20090203233438.203590@gmx.net>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

I have the same problem. Build fails and I can not find the patchfile. :(

I would be very glad, too hear something regarding this issue.

S0l0
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 11:05:53 -0800
> Von: Maxim Grigoriev <maxim@tensilica.com>
> An: Maxim Grigoriev <maxim@tensilica.com>
> CC: buildroot at uclibc.org
> Betreff: Re: [Buildroot] {buildroot 0004384]: GCC 4.3.1 fails with cannot compute suffix of object files

> Is this the right mailing list to ask questions about BUILDROOT ?
> 
> Should I ask some official maintainers directly instead ?
> 
> If there is a communication policy described somewhere, please, refer me 
> to it.
> 
> Thanks,
> -- Maxim
> 
> 
> Maxim Grigoriev wrote:
> > There is a buildroot issue 0004384:
> >
> >    
> http://lists.uclibc.org/pipermail/buildroot/2008-September/010792.html
> >
> > I understand it's a generic architecture-independent GCC 4.3.1+ compiler
> > problem
> > mentioned several times in different places ( e.g. bugzilla PRs 35577, 
> > 35693 ).
> >
> > On the buildroot mailing, list I found a reference to the patch
> >
> >   gcc-4.3.1-compile.patch 
> >
> > introduced by "antezedens" somewhere around 09-10-08.
> > But, I was not able to find this patch. Looks like it was withdrawn.
> >
> >                           * * * * *
> >
> > My question is: is this build failure supposed to be fixed on
> > the BUILDROOT makefiles/scripts level ? Or, setting 
> >
> > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$PWD/toolchain_build_arm/mpfr/lib:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
> >
> > from the top of buildroot tree is assumed to be a standard
> > setup for the buildroot build ? Is it documented anywhere ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -- Maxim
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > buildroot mailing list
> > buildroot at busybox.net
> > http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
> >   
> 
> _______________________________________________
> buildroot mailing list
> buildroot at busybox.net
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot

-- 
Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger geh?rt? Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger01