From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steffen Schulz Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:33:19 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] problem building openswan using svn-buildroot In-Reply-To: <87hc2l2yns.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> References: <499E05A7.2070403@unix-beratung.de> <87bpsv6ik4.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <49A17E91.7060104@unix-beratung.de> <87y6vy5okv.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <20090223102825.GB31413@cbg.dyndns.org> <87hc2l2yns.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> Message-ID: <20090223143319.GA6299@cbg.dyndns.org> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 090223 at 12:15, Peter Korsgaard wrote: > Steffen Schulz wrote: > Steffen> It's far from small though. On the bright side, it seems to be very modular.. > Ok, anyone wants to step up and support openswan/strongswan? Otherwise > I think our users are better off if we remove the package. I just updated a package I made a few months ago. It compiles and binaries seem to work, but I can not test it right now. BTW, it happened the second time now that I could not use the most recent version of a program because the libtool patch won't apply. I used the most recent strongswan version that seems to work. The other package this happened with is gnutls > 2.4.2. /steffen -- Chair for System Security mail: steffen.schulz at rub.de Ruhr-University Bochum phone: +49 (0)234 32 29177 Key fingerprint = B805 57BE E4AF 0104 CC51 77A1 CE6F 8D46 A04D 7875 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: strongswan4.2.9.patch Type: text/x-diff Size: 6865 bytes Desc: not available URL: