From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <hans-christian.egtvedt@atmel.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 09:37:06 +0100
Subject: [Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/toolchain/binutils
In-Reply-To: <87mybvcddu.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk>
References: <20090303220951.E40FB7626F@busybox.osuosl.org>
	<d6cda7730903060956r6a3c5fe8ra2ee09251ce81d61@mail.gmail.com>
	<878wnie4ab.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk>
	<d6cda7730903071820v7ba666ej2745c45f7d6ccf23@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090309065805.221e777e@hcegtvedt>
	<87r617ceh0.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk>
	<20090309090943.64c1d450@hcegtvedt>
	<87mybvcddu.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk>
Message-ID: <20090309093706.7971f8e1@hcegtvedt>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 09:24:29 +0100
Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org> wrote:

> >>>>> "Hans-Christian" == Hans-Christian Egtvedt
> >>>>> <hans-christian.egtvedt@atmel.com> writes:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>  >> Thanks - Ok, that's all the legal stuff - But what about the
>  >> technical work? I guess the FSF isn't particular interested in
>  >> patches against binutils 2.18 from 2007?
>  >> 
> 
>  Hans-Christian> Atmel will submit patches against current HEAD/trunk
> of course.
> 
> Great, does that mean that there's patches for 2.19(.1) somewhere that
> we could move to in BR?
> 

Not officially, no.

-- 
Best regards,
Hans-Christian Egtvedt