From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 01:28:41 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/toolchain: binutils external-toolchain gcc uClibc In-Reply-To: References: <20090130162827.2A05D765E9@busybox.osuosl.org> <20090330153259.0a7ee398@surf> <87ab73azsj.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <20090330175842.1960fed2@surf> <87prfyald1.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> Message-ID: <20090401012841.585dc38e@surf> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Le Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:56:54 -0300, Thiago A. Corr?a a ?crit : > Would that be a bad thing? Even if it's not integrated but a script, > say: ./script/fix-external-toolchain.sh > > Before/after running kconfig. > > It beats having the user to guess or remember. Or maybe we could just *not* show these options, and let a script auto-detect the values. For uClibc, they can easily be guessed from some uClibc-config.h script available in the toolchain. Sincerly, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com