From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hamish Moffatt Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:32:34 +1000 Subject: [Buildroot] svn commit: [26007] trunk/buildroot/package/openssl In-Reply-To: <20090407070120.F1F0D768C5@busybox.osuosl.org> References: <20090407070120.F1F0D768C5@busybox.osuosl.org> Message-ID: <20090414013234.GA29812@cloud.net.au> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 07:01:20AM +0000, jacmet at uclibc.org wrote: > Author: jacmet > Date: 2009-04-07 07:01:20 +0000 (Tue, 07 Apr 2009) > New Revision: 26007 > > Log: > openssl: bump version > > Patch by Gustavo Zacarias , closes #217 > > Fixes multiple security flaws - See > http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20090325.txt for details. > > Added: > trunk/buildroot/package/openssl/openssl-0.9.8k-do-not-build-docs.patch > trunk/buildroot/package/openssl/openssl-0.9.8k-dont-force-large-file.patch > trunk/buildroot/package/openssl/openssl-0.9.8k-nofips.patch > trunk/buildroot/package/openssl/openssl-0.9.8k-uclibc-susv3-legacy.patch > > Removed: > trunk/buildroot/package/openssl/openssl-0.9.8j-do-not-build-docs.patch > trunk/buildroot/package/openssl/openssl-0.9.8j-dont-force-large-file.patch > trunk/buildroot/package/openssl/openssl-0.9.8j-nofips.patch > trunk/buildroot/package/openssl/openssl-0.9.8j-uclibc-susv3-legacy.patch > > Modified: > trunk/buildroot/package/openssl/openssl.mk How about removing the version number from the patch filenames? They're just making the upgrades messy and there doesn't seem to have any benefit. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB