From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hamish Moffatt Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:32:49 +1000 Subject: [Buildroot] future of project support In-Reply-To: <877i1j9zcu.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> References: <35AF1D2435E24FA6B1C89344B22D099E@apexjs> <877i1j9zcu.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> Message-ID: <20090420003249.GA18066@cloud.net.au> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 03:36:01PM +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote: > Because of the project stuff. There's been discussion about getting > rid of that and simply use the external toolchain stuff if you want to > build seperate rootfs'es for similar hw, and I'm seriously considering > doing so. I'm in favour of some simplification. Here's my usage: I have a few related projects. I want to build them from the same source tree. Ideally I can have them all built within one check-out, so I can quickly make a change and test it in multiple projects (without checking in, updating the other check out etc). I don't care if everything is rebuilt for each project.. (except the toolchain possibly). I think the current mix of build_arch / project_build_arch is a mess, I'd prefer to have everything in project_build_arch really. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB