From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:02:30 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [git commit] CHANGES: add #163 + #473 In-Reply-To: <20090724055230.2080B77660@busybox.osuosl.org> References: <20090724055230.2080B77660@busybox.osuosl.org> Message-ID: <20090724110230.3f51597a@surf> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Le Fri, 24 Jul 2009 07:51:16 +0200, Peter Korsgaard a ?crit : > + #163: Xtensa architecture port I might wrong or be missing something, but I haven't seen the corresponding commits for this (maybe patches too large for the list ?). But if it was really committed, I was quite worried by the complexity added by the ? overlay ? mechanism proposed by this new architecture port, and that a public discussion on this new mechanism could have been interesting to see if it's the best solution, if it's the way we want Buildroot to go forward, etc. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com