From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 12:49:43 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 03/14] RESEND: handle MMU configuration In-Reply-To: <20091009115343.0fae0659@surf> References: <87skduj4ut.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <20091009115343.0fae0659@surf> Message-ID: <20091009104943.GJ2266@mx.loc> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 11:53:43AM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: >Le Wed, 7 Oct 2009 23:27:47 +0200, >Bernhard Reutner-Fischer a ?crit : > >> +config BR2_HAVE_NOMMU >> + def_bool n >> + # assume that we have an MMU per default. > >Maybe we should use BR2_HAVE_MMU, def_bool y. The >non-not-negative-if-not-options are really hard to understand. This is a hidden symbol that is (and has to be) only used in this spot. Everything in real packages is wired up to USE_MMU. That said, I don't mind if you want to change !! to ''. >> +config BR2_USE_MMU >> + bool "Use MMU" >> + default y >> + depends on !BR2_HAVE_NOMMU >> + help >> + If your target has an MMU and you want to use it >> + then say Y here. > >What's the usage of these two new options ? see how it's odd if one has to split out patches into too fine-grained pieces? See the arch touchup for the user. And yes, my initial patch contained - these knobs - the configury parts - actual use of the configury parts