From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 14:06:18 +0200
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 03/14] RESEND: handle MMU configuration
In-Reply-To: <87eipchjw9.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk>
References: <87skduj4ut.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk>
	<b1a1dc13edb6053d271297a4ac369d848c5f5749.1254945750.git.rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
	<20091009115343.0fae0659@surf> <87r5tchkvv.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk>
	<20091009113902.GM2266@mx.loc> <87eipchjw9.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk>
Message-ID: <20091009120618.GO2266@mx.loc>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 01:44:06PM +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>>>>>> "Bernhard" == Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> writes:
>
>Hi,
>
> Thomas> What's the usage of these two new options ?
> >> 
> >> Yes, I would like to know this as well. I would imagine properly
> >> supporting nommu would take quite some more effort than this (E.G. most
> >> packages should get hidden).
>
> Bernhard> why would you want to hide most of the package?
>
>Because they use fork or other nommu-nono's?

On a nommu box you'd typically not install KDE or stuff like that.
The typical package which will be used on nommu boxes should handle
fork vs, vfork just fine. If a package does not then this package
needs to be fixed and the fix sent upstream, obviously.