From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael S. Zick <minimod@morethan.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 07:01:50 -0600
Subject: [Buildroot] [git tag 2009.11] update for 2009.11
In-Reply-To: <20091201142204.3F954777B5@busybox.osuosl.org>
References: <20091201142204.3F954777B5@busybox.osuosl.org>
Message-ID: <200912020701.52887.minimod@morethan.org>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

On Tue December 1 2009, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> 
> commit: http://git.buildroot.net/buildroot/commit/?id=d0cb90792df5873af83f7277b17fe12aa1b91b19
> branch: http://git.buildroot.net/buildroot/commit/?id=refs/tags/2009.11
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
> 
> this is a tag, so no patch shown
>

Would you please tag the repository with a 2010.02 branch tag?

That way users can continue to fix 2009.11 without being exposed
to the code-churn of producing 2010.02.

The "release and move-on" type of organization really is not appropriate
for something as mission critical as the build system in use.

Heck, after a decade, even kernel.org learned that lesson.  ;)

Mike
> _______________________________________________
> buildroot mailing list
> buildroot at busybox.net
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
> 
>