From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael S. Zick Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:00:57 -0600 Subject: [Buildroot] [Bug 803] [PATCH] lua - add shared library patch and config option for readline/ncurses support In-Reply-To: <4B26A5E0.50908@zacarias.com.ar> References: <200912141422.01807.minimod@morethan.org> <4B26A5E0.50908@zacarias.com.ar> Message-ID: <200912141500.59567.minimod@morethan.org> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Mon December 14 2009, Gustavo Zacarias wrote: > Michael S. Zick wrote: > > > Depends on the version - but the current and recent version have had the makefile > > reorganized to always build-in the standard libraries; > > So yes, the makefile needs to be un-reorganized (by a patch?) to get Lua + shared > > libraries out of it. > > (The prior to 5.0 organization). > > > > Mike > > I think we're on a different tune here. > No, I follow you, there is just two interpertations of "Lua" - See my post on recommending that its inclusion in Buildroot should be reorganized before too much time is spent doing these "special case" changes. I.E: the reorganization described in my post will also give you what you are trying to achieve here. Mike > I'm commenting about the proposed patch that changes the lua package in > the following ways: > 1) Makes a shared liblua instead of a static one. > 2) Allows the package to just install liblua with options for lua and luac. > 3) Also allows for lua to be built without readline support. > Plain upstream 5.1.4 lua (current in buildroot) doesn't build shared > libraries by default, and that's what i talking about (point 1) and the > proposed change in buildroot is probably lacking a patch (or the libtool > hooks to do so in the .mk file). > Regards. > >