From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 22:18:55 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] gcc-error with latest buildroot In-Reply-To: <200912261358.09189.minimod@morethan.org> References: <200912261427.53159.marco-glatz@web.de> <20091226183602.0f2debb4@surf> <200912261358.09189.minimod@morethan.org> Message-ID: <20091226221855.4ddc5518@surf> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, First of all, could you please stop being aggressive and offensive ? Le Sat, 26 Dec 2009 13:58:06 -0600, "Michael S. Zick" a ?crit : > > (Note: of course this is something we should fix, but having gcc and > > associated development files on the target is an unusual setup, > > that's why it isn't widely tested) > > > > Say what? > How can you know that? Because the feature has existed for years and until a few days/weeks ago, no one reported the issue and no one stepped in to fix it. Which means that no one was seriously using it. > So unless you have some other means of tracking user submitted test > reports how can you say that something is "not widely tested"? Users facing issues are invited to report them in the bugzilla. However, we cannot guarantee any specific response time, Buildroot is a community effort. Bugs are fixed depending on developer interest, availability and patches provided by other developers. If you want guarantees, please contract a commercial support. I'd be happy to provide one through the company I'm working for (Free Electrons). Please note that I'm not happy to see features broken in Buildroot and I very much would like the gcc on target issue fixed. But this is not a reason for being offensive. Cheers, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com