From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 13:37:25 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 04/14] package: added lirc In-Reply-To: <4d28d4b51002090354r251fd6bfk5e08ccf9cd460baa@mail.gmail.com> References: <1265566076-10628-1-git-send-email-llandwerlin@gmail.com> <1265566076-10628-5-git-send-email-llandwerlin@gmail.com> <20100209123756.78a62141@surf> <4d28d4b51002090354r251fd6bfk5e08ccf9cd460baa@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20100209133725.53f97148@surf> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 12:54:45 +0100 Lionel Landwerlin wrote: > > What is the policy regarding installation to the $(STAGING_DIR) > > directory for applications ? Some of them say > > FOO_INSTALL_STAGING=NO, some others FOO_INSTALL_STAGING=YES. > > I usually install libraries in staging, not binaries. So in this case, lirc contains only applications, so it shouldn't be installed to STAGING, no ? > Why do you need unstripped binaries ? Are you doing remote debug > using the staging directory ? Yes, this is also what the staging directory is for. In the future, we will try if compiling by default all libraries/applications with debugging symbols in the $(STAGING_DIR) is doable. Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com