From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:04:52 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] gcc: remove option on SJLJ exceptions In-Reply-To: <201007290747.44044.minimod@morethan.org> References: <201007290659.39124.minimod@morethan.org> <20100729143016.07c9a2f0@surf> <201007290747.44044.minimod@morethan.org> Message-ID: <20100729150452.312a0883@surf> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 07:47:41 -0500 "Michael S. Zick" wrote: > > Sorry, I couldn't find the postings you're refering to. Do you have > > a pointer ? > > No I don't have a pointer handy. Ok. I looked in the archives for all messages with "lua" in the subject since March 2008, and I didn't found one. > Look for one of the threads that you terminated discussion with a: > > "If you don't like it, you can hire commercial support for it from my > firm." > > It may even be the same thread where the ethics of using an "Open > Source Project" as a "loss leader" to gain commercial customers was > discussed. Ah, ah, I now understand why you're so aggressive against me :-) Please read that very thread again, and see how offensive you were against the volunteers working on Buildroot. Just as you are in the current thread, for no reason. I think we're both trying to make Buildroot better, on a volunteer basis. So let's do so in a nice and friendly atmosphere, no ? Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com