From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] Libtool work: a tentative summary
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2010 16:22:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101003162219.62ad7888@surf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1286112146.27944.349.camel@coalu.atr>
Hello,
On Sun, 03 Oct 2010 15:22:26 +0200
Lionel Landwerlin <llandwerlin@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here is what I would like to us to do for the next releases :
>
> 1) Bump libtool package to 2.2, more and more packages require libtool
> 2.2, and we're stuck to not autoreconfigure them without 2.2. This is
> already creating problems to Thomas when trying to bump host
> libglib/libgtk packages.
1a) Integrate Martin Banky's proposal so that packages using libtool
2.2 can work without the need to autoreconfigure them.
> 2) Eventually integrate some patches to libtool 2.2 to be able to
> cross compile autoreconfigured packages.
>
> 3) When the libtool 2.4 sysroot issue is sorted out, bump to libtool
> 2.4 and get rid of the patches integrated in 2).
>
> I think 1) is mandatory for 2010.11.
And 1a).
So, I would suggest :
*) Peter merges Martin Banky's set of patches on libtool
http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2010-September/037505.html
*) Lionel, could you propose a patch that just bumps libtool to 2.2 ?
Lionel, Martin, Peter, what do you think ?
Thanks,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-03 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-28 20:36 [Buildroot] Libtool work: a tentative summary Thomas Petazzoni
2010-09-28 23:26 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2010-09-29 8:32 ` Paulius Zaleckas
2010-09-29 8:51 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2010-09-29 11:01 ` Paulius Zaleckas
2010-09-29 11:12 ` [Buildroot] On internal vs. external toolchains Thomas Petazzoni
2010-09-29 19:59 ` [Buildroot] Libtool work: a tentative summary Martin Banky
2010-10-03 13:22 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2010-10-03 14:22 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2010-10-03 22:36 ` Martin Banky
2010-10-03 23:47 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2010-10-04 1:19 ` Martin Banky
2010-10-04 8:09 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2010-10-05 0:04 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2010-10-07 14:57 ` [Buildroot] Tentative conclusion on the libtool work Thomas Petazzoni
2010-10-07 16:34 ` Lionel Landwerlin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101003162219.62ad7888@surf \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox