From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 13:30:56 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [git commit master 1/1] toolchain: do not require full path In-Reply-To: References: <20101016204702.67E958D282@busybox.osuosl.org> <871v7pet77.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <201010221719.23905.vapier@gentoo.org> <87tykdcsma.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> Message-ID: <20101023133056.24a6d6fe@surf> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 04:32:58 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > not really. there are plenty of examples where people are allowed to > maintain their own branch in the same "master" tree. uClibc, glibc, > OE off the top of my head. I personally don't see any big advantage of this option compared to the current organization and workflow, it seems just to be a matter of personal taste. So let's keep the workflow we've been using for the last two years, which has proven to be pretty good for Buildroot development. Regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com