From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Frysinger Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 15:10:44 -0500 Subject: [Buildroot] Pull request buildroot.git (vapier branch) In-Reply-To: <20101206202754.57658344@surf> References: <1291503121-24114-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> <201012060156.53523.vapier@gentoo.org> <20101206202754.57658344@surf> Message-ID: <201012061510.44903.vapier@gentoo.org> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Monday, December 06, 2010 14:27:54 Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > I didn't mean those two things to be bound together. But it's well > known that : > > * Some packages do not support static build > > * Some packages do not support no-MMU > > Those two sets of packages are not identical, that's why I proposed two > different options. A package that doesn't support static build should > do: > > depends on !BR2_PREFER_STATIC_LIB > > and all packages that do not work on !MMU should do > > depends on BR2_USE_MMU > > My intention is that users can't mistakenly select packages that do not > build statically and/or do not work on !MMU systems. i follow now. this makes sense to me. -mike -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: