From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Frysinger Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 15:55:19 -0500 Subject: [Buildroot] Pull request buildroot.git (vapier branch) In-Reply-To: <20101206214405.1fe43de1@surf> References: <1291503121-24114-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> <201012061520.47907.vapier@gentoo.org> <20101206214405.1fe43de1@surf> Message-ID: <201012061555.20000.vapier@gentoo.org> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Monday, December 06, 2010 15:44:05 Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 15:20:47 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > > > > irda-utils: new package for IrDA devices > > > > > > > > > > I know Peter wants a short description + author in each patch. Your > > > > > patches are fairly obvious, but that's the rule :) > > > > > > > > i dont know what you mean by author. git already tracks authorship. > > > > > > Peter still wants the patch we have in Buildroot to carry a description > > > and an author. The author of the patch may not be the person who > > > imported it into Buildroot. > > > > when using `git am` or `git pull`, it does retain authorship. i dont see > > how the changeset would make it into the tree unless people were > > manually doing `patch && git commit`. > > I'm not talking about the patches you are sending to Buildroot, but the > patches that are added to packages (i.e patches inside the patches). oh, i missed that. i wrote these patches and sent them upstream. i'll add that metadata. -mike -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: